Planned
The source describes an intention, target or development concept. Treat the quantity as forward-looking until construction or operation evidence appears.
A practical guide to comparing reported NdFeB recycling capacity in Europe without treating project targets, design capacity and actual throughput as the same metric. Unlike the Europe recycling overview, this page focuses on capacity claims rather than a general company and facility directory.
Searches for NdFeB recycling capacity often return numbers from different stages of a project and different points in the material chain. A useful comparison starts by naming the basis of the number before comparing it with another source.
| Signal | What it can describe | What it does not prove on its own |
|---|---|---|
| Reported project or nameplate capacity | A stated design, target or planned annual scale. | That the facility is built, commissioned or achieving the stated scale. |
| Input capacity | The quantity of magnet scrap, alloy, powder or another feedstock a process is designed to receive. | The quantity of saleable rare-earth material produced. |
| Output capacity | A stated production target for alloy, powder, separated rare-earth compounds or another output. | That the input, yield, quality or customer qualification is publicly demonstrated. |
| Actual throughput | A measured or explicitly reported operating volume for a defined period. | That the same volume will continue or can be scaled without qualification. |
The source describes an intention, target or development concept. Treat the quantity as forward-looking until construction or operation evidence appears.
The project has a stronger implementation signal, but commissioning does not automatically equal stable commercial throughput.
Look for the exact operating wording, period, input/output basis and whether the source reports a pilot, batch, line or full facility.
This approach produces a more useful evidence base than a single headline total, especially while projects use different definitions and disclosure levels.
“Capacity” can refer to feedstock intake, intermediate material, alloy or powder output. Confirm the material basis first.
Check the publication date and whether the source refers to a future phase, a revised target, a pilot or a currently operating line.
Compare like with like: same stage, same unit, same material basis and the same level of evidence.
Use the source-linked profiles to see how current targets, planned outputs and downstream metal nameplate claims are kept separate.
It is a reported quantity connected to a defined material basis and project stage. The figure may describe magnet-bearing input, intermediate material, alloy or powder output, a target, nameplate capacity or actual throughput.
The Monitor records the material basis, project stage, unit, publication date, source quality and whether the figure describes input, output, target, nameplate capacity or actual throughput. Only like-for-like claims should be compared.
No. Figures from different stages or material bases can double-count the same route and can mix targets with operating output. A market total requires a defined boundary and consistent claim type.
The protected atlas links project profiles to their evidence trail, status and update history. The public methodology explains why capacity and throughput are not silently merged.